| 105 | 0 | 95 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
人工智能技术的飞速发展使技术奇点成为可预见的未来。在后奇点时代,人工智能将形成一种具有自主能力的技术个体,这难免会动摇人类在认识和实践领域的中心地位。当技术个体因承担某种社会角色而嵌入社会结构时,实际的社会关系将呈现出更大的复杂性与不确定性。为了迈向永久生存的人机共生文明,需要回溯人类历史上技术变革与社会关系演进之间的内在联系,解释并剖析人类社会中不同阶级、群体与技术个体之间的关系,进而重构技术个体嵌入下的社会关系。重构社会关系的核心在于摒弃既非“独生”也非“寄生”的对立思维,树立一种人类与人工智能命运与共的社会意识。这意味着,人机共生不是脑机接口式简单直接的物理结合,而是在人机相互促进协作的社会关系中形成能够保证永久生存的命运共同体意识。在这种关系下,永久生存不再是个体的生物学延续,而是通过伦理契约与技术协同实现文明永恒。这正是技术奇点之后人类与人工智能共同书写的人机共生未来文明。
Abstract:The rapid development of artificial intelligence(AI) technology has rendered the technological singularity a foreseeable reality. In the post-singularity era, AI will form autonomous technological individuals, which will inevitably challenge humanity,s central position in the realms of cognition and practice. When technological individuals become embedded in social structures by assuming certain social roles, actual social relations will exhibit greater complexity and uncertainty. To advance toward a permanently sustainable civilization of human-machine symbiosis, it is necessary to trace the intrinsic link between technological change and the evolution of social relations throughout history, to interpret and analyze the relationships among different social classes, groups, and technological individuals, and thereby to reconstruct social relations under their embedding. The core of this reconstruction lies in abandoning the oppositional mindset of “neither solitary existence nor parasitism” and cultivating a social consciousness of shared destiny between humanity and AI. This means that human-machine symbiosis is not merely a physical interface, as with brain-computer interfaces, but rather a consciousness of shared destiny formed within social relations of mutual promotion and collaboration between humans and machines, capable of ensuring permanent survival. In such a relationship, permanent survival is no longer the biological continuity of individuals, but the perpetuation of civilization achieved through ethical contracts and technological collaboration between two intelligent species—a future civilization of humanmachine symbiosis co-written by humanity and AI in the post-singularity era.
(1)The Noble Prize. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020[EB/OL].(2020-10-06)[2026-03-22]. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2020/press-release/.
(1)尼克.人工智能简史[M]. 2版.北京:人民邮电出版社,2021:114.
(2)西蒙东.论技术物的存在模式[M].许煜,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2024:11-12.
(3)涂良川,唐春燕.人工智能“技术自主性”的哲学叙事[J].学术论坛,2025(5):1-11.
(4)FLEMING D, BAILYN B. The intellectual migration:Europe and America, 1930-1960[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1969:240.
(5)VINGE V. Technological singularity[C]//NASA Lewis Research Center,Ohio Aerospace Institute.Vision-21:interdisciplinary science and engineering in the era of cyberspace. Cleveland:NASA Lewis Research Center,1993:13.
(1)王天恩,王金伟.人工智能观:一个人类新的安身立命问题[J].思想政治教育,2025(4):12-19.
(2)库兹韦尔.奇点临近[M].李庆诚,董振华,田源,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2011:9.
(3)库兹韦尔.奇点更近[M].芦义,译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2024:6.
(4)库兹韦尔.奇点更近[M].芦义,译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2024:13-15.
(5)吴冠军.在技术奇点与技术封建主义之间的深度求索[J].探索与争鸣,2025(3):36-40,177.
(1)马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第31卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1998:102.
(2)STIEGLER B. States of shock:stupidity and knowledge in the twenty-first century[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,2015:120.
(3)马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1958:144.
(4)新华社.习近平向2024年世界互联网大会乌镇峰会开幕视频致贺[N].人民日报,2024-11-21(1).
(1)许煜.论中国的技术问题——宇宙技术初论[M].卢睿洋,苏子滢,译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,2021:16.
(2)马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2012:406.
(3)马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第31卷[M]. 2版.北京:人民出版社,1998:102.
(4)马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:158.
(1)西蒙东.论技术物的存在模式[M].许煜,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2024:导论6.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16524/j.45-1002.2026.03.004
中图分类号:TP18;C912.3
引用信息:
[1]贾云飞,吴宏政.迈向人机共生文明:后奇点时代的社会关系重构[J].学术论坛,2026,49(03):28-37+157.DOI:10.16524/j.45-1002.2026.03.004.
2026-05-26
2026-05-26